7th century Tamil Nadu, India.
A little boy is born to pious Brahmin
parents in the quaint little town of Sirkazhi. As the boy attains the age of
three, he is taken to a nearby Shiva temple. While the father takes a dip in
the temple’s pond, Lord Shiva and his consort Parvathi appear in front of the
boy. Before the father comes back to the son, they disappear and the little boy
is left with drops of milk on his lips. When asked who fed him, the little
finger points up towards the sky and the soft lips start singing a hymn
praising the lord. Over the following years, the boy goes up to sing the most
amazing hymns in Tamil that forms the Holy Book of Saivism (religion of the Shiva
devotees). The little boy was none else than - one of the most renowned of the 63
Nayanmars - Thirugnana Sambandar. The lad who was fed by the Goddess herself!
15th Century Eastern Europe.
The cruel of the cruelest
King reigns over the country. The Ottoman Empire is being eroded away by this
ruthless warrior. As tens of thousands of enemies' bodies get cruelly impaled
in long and sharp arrows, the horrific image of this King spreads throughout
Europe as a forest fire. He was none else than King Vlad III Dracula - the demonic
warrior whose very thought and the bloody cruel punishments bring shrills and
shivers to people up to this day!
Now, why are these two different people being juxtaposed? Do
they share anything in common? What if they do? To understand the link here, readers should first clearly understand what "Impalement" is, and how it made Vlad Dracula stand out in history as the most horrific ruler. For the movie-buffs out there, impalement ("Kazhuvettram") is what Kamal Haasan (“Rangaraja Nambi”) gets as punishment for not practicing Saivism (worshipping Lord Shiva) in “Dasavatharam” movie. It's a kind of punishment where the body of a human is pierced from his bottom and pushed up through the body, to reach out through the head. (This being such a gory punishment is precisely the reason why the movie didn't show the way the punishment exactly works, but toned it down a bit). It was such a torturous execution method used in the early and medieval ages.
Now to the story that links everything up. It was the 6th century in ancient Tamil Nadu when the saint Thirugnana Sambandhar lived. It was a time when Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism coexisted in the land. However, oftentimes there were quarrels among these different groups, usually followed by persecution of the losing religious group. (Note that the Hindus were divided into Saivites and Vaishnavites, and the quarrels between them is yet another story!) The Pandya King called Koonpandiyan who ruled around the region of Madurai, was coaxed to convert to Jainism by the Jain monks in his country. This displeased the Queen and his ministers to a great extent, who were ardent worshippers of Shiva. After knowing about the young Saivite saint called Sambandar, they solicit his help to cure the king's recent illness and also to convert him back to Hinduism (Saivism). Sambandhar travels to Madurai and successfully cures the king's illness (that the Jains couldn’t) by singing a hymn and smearing holy ash on the king's arm. Unable to accept the defeat, the Jains set up a second test wherein the Jain literature palm leaves and the Saivaite palm leaves (of Sambandhar’s) are to be fed to fire, and whichever group defies the test of fire, wins. As the leaves are fed to fire, the Jain leaves are burnt to ashes, Sambandhar’s leaves are untouched. Unable to accept the defeat again, the Jains challenge Sambandhar for a final test - this time, a test of water.
Now when I step into a Hindu temple and touch the feet of the 63 Nayanmar saints one by one - and when I reach Thirugnana Sambandhar - I would stop for a moment. To think.
~